The involvement of Northern NGOs with the developing countries

In this research paper we look at the inter-group communication of Northern NGOs with the developing countries. They argon prime donors of most developing countries programs which are geared towards alleviating the welfare of the quite a little such as improve health and living condition.Local NGOs shake been twisting as intermediaries between giving medication activity and the people.The northern NGOs serve their specific agenda and mandate contrary to what the poor rural urban expect.NORTHERN NGOSNorthern NGOs correspond international organizations who are donors to developing countries that are are donors such as area entrust and non frequent agencies. Their relation with the south makes it the subject of this research paper. The relationship with government activitys and nongovernmental organization with them plays a critical role in understanding their mandates and objectives in helping the population in the rural and urban constituents.The urban and rural reality ha s diverse needs ranging from health, unemployment, education, poverty and access to other services. In this respect governments find been unable to leave behind these services to their community in an effective and wider coverage manner. For instance, in South Africa, 30 % of the population are unemployed and for the 20% of the poorest ho utiliseholds, 53% ere unemployed (Adato & Haddad 2001, p.1).It is also reported that there is need for job base in all regions inhabited by the poorest ho useholds i.e. urban, metropolitan and rural. Based on these facts the governments of countries in the developing humanity have focused their programs to alleviate these problems e.g. the welfare of the masses, improve living condition, health and service provision (Li 2005).The programs have achieved different success margins and limitations. roughly of government programs are constrained in reaching the people because of bureaucracy, dictator rule and high cost of implementation. Since mos t of the programs are financed by international community (Northern NGOs) and governments.For instance, in Indonesia the population Bank has developed affable development programs to help them achieve their mandate and objectives. In order to do these, they have used analysis of the needs of the regions to come up with the plan. Due to constraints in working with the government directly they have supported and strengthened the local NGOs and civil society organizations (CSOs) to advance their objectives (Li 2005).The rationale use includes improving transparency in village planning level, conflict resolution and step sponsorship of NGOs. However NGOs have their own limitations such as the leaders use as a vehicle for reformation of social and political life. The World Bank has used neo-liberal system to ensure good governance by instituting a competitive process based on administrative and decentralized structures (Li 2005).More so in order for the region to be eligible for suppor t from World Bank it had to proof that it is pro-poor and is supervised by the World Bank team. According to Arya (1999) he explains the role in which NGOs have worked with their government under the funding of donors (government agencies, private agencies and governments). The joint objectives for the collaboration include access to technical resources, gain legitimacy or recognition from the people, obtain take into account solution and developmental problems, enhance peoples intricacy and provide better accountability, transparency and public reform system (Arya 1999).Donors view NGOs as intermediaries or transitory to government links to people and use them to as instruments of improved service delivery and outreach to the government. The donors see their task as completed when NGOs are gnarly in the project programs with the government. Most private donors do not support or supervise the excerption criterion even when there is resistance from the government. However, they can play a key role in establishing mechanism to become NGOs so that they have a beneficial effect on service delivery, participation and decentralization (Arya 1999).Northern NGOs for the past decade have increased funding to southern NGOs with due to limitation speciality of delivery, reforms, cost efficiency, sustainability and participation from the government. DeGabriele (2002), when regarding about improvement of community based management projects. He previewed the World Health Organization commitment to provide access to safe and clean pissing.But from the experiences gathered two challenges emerged water accessibility could not be achieved with the rate of population growth and the intended improvements to health were not accomplished within 1980 1990 decade. This becomes the redefinition of the concept of community management within water sector. It was realized that water accessibility could wholly be achieved with participatory role implemented (DeGabriele 2002).A ED (1998) elaborates on the participatory approach used to i.e. the participatory accomplishment and Action approach which involves communities to analyze their needs, identify possible solutions and develop, implement and evaluate the plan of action. In line of business NGOs can have negative implication to the poor because they can use them to legitimize their existence, solicit finances and raise their profile for the disadvantage of the poor. Changes in their positive attitude will go way to bring positive results (AED 1998, Kaiser 2000, p. 6).CONCLUSIONNorthern NGOs play critical role in financing development programs to developing countries. They have been involved directly or indirectly with government depending on the nature and intensity of the resources used and the origin of the donor. Most private agencies finance the local NGOs who are viewed as intermediaries or transitory link between the government and people. The donors have used them to enhance their agenda and m andate to ensure good governance of project- programs they agree with the government.REFERENCEAdato, M. Haddad, L, 2001, impoverishment targets, community-based public works programs a cross-disciplinary assessment in South Africa, International Food Policy look into Institute (IFPRI). addressable from http//www.ifpri.org/divs/fcnd/dp/papers/fcndp121.pdf 8 April 2008AED, 1998, Empowering communities participatory techniques for community-based programme development, Academy for Educational Development, Washington DC, lendable from 8April 2008Arya, V, 1999, Towards a relationship of significance lessons from a decade ofcollaboration between government and NGOs in Rajasthan, India, Agricultural explore and Extension Network (AgREN), Available from 8April 2008DeGabriele, J, 2002, Improving community based management of boreholes a case study from Malawi Land Tenure Centre, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Available from 8April 2008Kaiser, T, 2000, Participatory & beneficiary-bas ed approaches in evaluation ofhumanitarian programmes, Evaluation and Policy Analysis social unit (EPAU), UNHCR, Available from http//www.unhcr.org/research/RESEARCH/3c7527f91.pdf 8April 2008Li, T, 2005, The government through community the World Bank in Indonesia, University of Toronto, Available from 8April 2008